1 March 2010
The employment situation continues to dominate the deliberations of economic pundits. Apparently, this lagging indicator is not catching up fast enough to satisfy economists. Nevertheless, the unemployment rate fell from 10% in December to 9.7% in January. Further, the number of Americans filing for initial unemployment insurance fell by 8,000 the week ending January 23rd, and continuing claims for the week ending January 16th were down 57,000. Unemployment claims declined by more than 1,000 in five states with Pennsylvania leading the way with 25,819 fewer claims. Claims rose by more than 1,000 in just three states with California having the dubious honor of leading the pack, jumping 43,748. In other news, Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 5.9% in Q409 on the heels of a 2.2% increase the prior period. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose a nominal 0.2% on a seasonally adjusted basis in January. Over the last 12 months, the index increased 2.6% before seasonal adjustment.
Personal income increased $44.5 billion or 0.4% in December and disposable personal income increased $45.9 billion or 0.4%. Personal and disposable income levels have grown consistently, between 0.3% and 0.5% per month, since August 2009.
The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® (LEI) increased 0.3% in January following a 1.2% gain in December and a 1.1% rise in November. According to Conference Board economists, the US LEI has risen steadily for nearly a year now and the cumulative change based on the last six months is 9.8% on an annualized basis. Current economic conditions, as measured by the Conference Board Coincident Economic Index® (CEI) also indicate improvement since July 2009. The CEI rose 0.2% in January following no change in December and a 0.3% rise in November.
Housing Highlights – This seesaw is beginning to make us nauseous. However, some of the news is moderately uplifting. Existing home sales increased 13.9% in Q409 in 48 states and the District of Columbia; 32 states saw double-digit gains to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 6.03 million units. Year-over-year, sales were stronger in 49 states and DC and all but three had double-digit gains. Distressed property accounted for 32% of Q4 transactions, down from 37% one year earlier.
On a regional basis, the strongest pace was in the West with sales rising 16.2% to an annual rate of 1.38 million, 18.2% higher than one year ago. The Midwest jumped 14.5% to a similar pace representing a year-over-year gain of 29.9%. In the South, existing home sales rose 13.8% to an annual rate of 2.23 million or 28.2% year-over-year; and The Northeast exhibited an increase of 11.1% for an annualized rate of 1.03 million, 33.6% higher than a year ago.
Home prices rose for the seventh consecutive month in December, albeit a modest 0.3%. Prices continue to set the pace. The median sales price for existing single-family homes was $172,900 in Q409, down 4.1% from Q408. Condominium sales prices showed a median of $177,300, down 4.8% from Q408. Based on S&P’s Case-Shiller home price index annual report, national housing prices have dropped 32% from Q206, troughed in Q109, and rebounded 6.3% by the end of 2009.
According to Trulia.com, the share of homes on the market reflecting price reductions had declined an average 21% as of February 1st representing a marked decrease compared to November 2009 when 26% of listed homes had exhibited at least one price reduction. The average discount for price-reduced homes is holding steady at 11% of the original list price. Trulia has been tracking price reduction data since April 2009.
January saw an unexpected drop in new home sales. The 11.2% tumble from December was the third consecutive monthly drop based on Commerce Department data. Estimates call for 374,000 new home sales in 2009, 22.9% fewer than 2008.
At the end of December, the seasonally adjusted estimate of new home inventory was 231,000, representing an 8.1-month supply of homes at the current sales pace.
New home starts rose in January to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 591,000, the highest level in six months. Total starts were up nearly 3% for the month and rose in three of four regions analyzed by the US Commerce Department. The Northeast led the fray bouncing upward 10%, followed by the West, up 9%, and the South, +1%. Conversely, the Mid-Western region saw a decline of 3.2%. Single-family housing starts were at a rate of 484,000 in January, up 1.5% from December’s revised rate of 477,000.
Building permit activity jumped 10.9% in December as builders anticipated the spring selling season and the April 30th deadline for homebuyer tax credit eligibility, only to decline 4.9% in January to an annualized rate of 621,000 units. Single-family building permits were up 0.4% month-over-month in January and multi-family permits were down a significant 26% to an annual rate of just 96,000 units.
Data from Altos Research shows housing supplies steadily declined over the last 16 months. The company advises that there are 20% fewer homes for sale now than there were in 2008.
The current Pending Homes Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in December, increased 1% and now stands 10.9% higher than December 2008. This compares to a 16.4% decrease in November, as the initial tax credit legislation was about to expire. In December, the Midwest led with a 5.2% increase, followed by the Northeast, +2.3%, and the South, +2.2%. The index fell 3.8% in the West but remains 18.6% above one year ago.
According to the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) rates for 30-year home loans rose above 5% for the first time in three weeks, the week ending February 26th. Previously, mortgage rates had fallen two weeks in a row, ending the week of February 19th at 4.93%. Rates had dropped to a record 4.71% in December and were 5.04% one year ago.
Seemingly contradictory, the MBA also reported a decrease in mortgage applications of 8.5% on a seasonally adjusted basis. Weather and distressed housing conditions served to stall activity as snowed-in potential home buyers hunkered down, seeing no urgency to make the purchase decision.
Based on current sales activity, builder confidence improved in February rising two points to its highest level since November. The component gauging sales expectations over the next six months rose a single point, and the component gauging traffic remained flat. On a regional basis, February’s results were mixed. While the Midwest and South each registered two-point gains, the Northeast and West each registered one-point declines, suggesting weather influence.
Barometric Beat – The current employment situation is truly an albatross, not only to the unemployed, but also to economists who just can’t quite make sense of the indicators, and to those who rely on them to strategize. We understand the conundrum the data present and wish the media would do less to exacerbate the problem. Refreshingly, we found a recent article in The New York Times that expounds the need to be cautious when attempting to understand and apply employment figures to economic conditions and future projections. Floyd Norris wrote on February 22nd: “It snowed this month in much of the United States and that may create unnecessary fears that a double-dip recession is upon us.” He goes on to opine that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report scheduled for release on March 5th will more than likely suggest that a “double dip” may be in our future based on current conditions. However, he points out that the data will focus on the week of the 7th through to 13th when much of the east coast was ravaged by blizzards. In this regard, he hypothesizes that many people who actually had jobs may have reported they did not work during that particular week and similarly, companies may indicate they had fewer people on their payrolls. He goes on to cite an historic example. In January 1996, the BLS employment report called for the loss of 206,000 jobs as the result of severe weather. Analysts deciphered it as evidence of a deteriorating economy that was “flirting with recession.” However, a month later, a “stunningly strong rebound” showed the addition of 705,000 new jobs resulting in the unemployment rate falling 3/10 of a percentage point to 5.5%. After numerous revisions, it was finally determined that just 19,000 jobs had been lost that January, and 434,000 jobs were added the following month. The end result: job growth accelerated in 1996 and 1997 and GDP accelerated 4.4% in 1996 and stayed above 4% in 1997, 1998 and 1999, and the much-anticipated recession did not occur. We offer this as perspective. While the Market Barometer’s job is to report raw data, misinterpretation has the ability to paralyze our industry. This condition was the reason for the creation of this publication in 1991. And as was the case during that particular period, a desire to move forward will have the greatest propensity to alter the outcome, and ultimately, history.
12 January 2010
Housing Highlights – Builder outlook on sales conditions has remained steady for the last three months in spite of new home sales taking an 11.3% month-over-month dive in November. This translates to a seasonally adjusted sales pace of 355,000 new home sales, 9% below the same month one year ago. But the good news is that existing home sales rose again in November, up 7.4% on the heels of a 10.1% jump in October, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.54 million units. Regionally, the West led the fray with a 10.6% increase, followed by the Midwest (+8.4%); the Northeast (up 6.6%) and the South, +4.8%. Year-over year increases in sales ranged from 28.1% in the West to 53.5% in the Midwest.
Barometric Beat– All of the news is good news. You can’t twist it, manipulate it, or otherwise bastardize it -- but mainstream media persists in trying. In a recent blog posted on Bowden’s Beat we pointed out two articles that had been published on a national news website (on the same day) that were utterly contradictory. One article posited that “Jobs are on the Way” while the other, entitled “Joblessness is Here to Stay, flew in the face of it. While we admire the website for giving both positions exposure, they served to further confuse the issue by confronting facts with opinion. While the positive article cited numerous real-time examples of upward employment movement, the negative article opined about what may happen if the US continues some of its policies, i.e., the crystal ball approach. In this regard, the positive article suggested that prognosticators have been behind the curve for years, citing an example published in the Wall Street Journal written by a Stanford professor entitled “Obama’s Radicalism is Killing the Dow.” The commentary noted that the article was published in March 2009 and since then the Dow had rallied more than 60%. Other paradoxical examples of the median maxim “bad news sells” include a recently published opinion that while the housing market “appears” poised for rejuvenation, it is an “illusion” and the rally is “artificial” supported purely by government stimulus. Conversely, another article points to the fact that there is no better time to purchase real property due to low prices, interest rates and incentives, and therefore, the rally has legs. And speaking of interest rates, many prognosticators had mortgage rates reaching 7% in 2009, yet here we are in 2010 continuing to hover at 5%. In our humble opinion, while the stimulus programs have helped to absorb standing inventory and spur buyer activity, first-time buyers are not the only market segment with interest in real estate. Thanks to the mounting stabilization of the housing industry, investors are re-entering the market, and move-up buyers are a very real consequence of the subsidized first-time buyer frenzy. To quote Marian Schaffer of SouthernWayofLife.com: “The Baby Boomer generation’s buying ability is powerful – more so than first time home buyer credits will ever be.” While we concur, we also know that Gen-X and Gen-Y represent every bit as large and powerful a cohort and the leading edge of these segments is moving into what we call “peak earning years.” In this regard, they will provide the demand for diversity in new and re-positioned master-planned communities. The challenge is to be ahead of the curve, not behind it. < > 24 November 2009
Housing Highlights